Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

NaF, CPC ¹× UDCA¸¦ ÇÔÀ¯ÇÑ ±¸°­¾çÄ¡¾×ÀÇ Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸· Á¦°ÅÈ¿°ú ¹× Ä¡Àº¿° ¿ÏÈ­ È¿°ú Æò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû ½ÇÇ迬±¸

Clinical study of mouth rinse containing sodium fluoride, cetylpyridinium chloride ana urnsodesoxycholinic acid on dental plaque and gingivitis

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.121 ~ 133
ÀÌÇö, ½Å½Âö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÇö (  ) - µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÀÇÇб³½Ç
½Å½Âö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡°ú

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚ´Â CPC ¹× UDCA ±¸°­¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×ÀÇ Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸· ¹× Ä¡Àº¿°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ
À§ÇÏ¿© 18¼¼ ÀÌ»ó 30¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ ¼ºÀÎ ³²³à 117¸íÀ» ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© À½¼ººñ±³±º°ú
Listerine¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¾ç¼ººñ±³±º, 0.02% NaF ¹× 0.05% CPC ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â
CPC½ÇÇ豺, 0.02% NaF ¹× 0.05% CPC¿Í 0.005% UDCA ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â UDCA½ÇÇè
±ºÀ¸·Î °¢°¢ 33¸í, 21¸í, 33¸í, 30¸íÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»óÀû ¿¬±¸½ÇÇèÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°¢ ±ºÀÇ Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸·¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¸¦ °üÂûÇϱâ À§ÇØ PHP index¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 4ÁÖ°£ 1ÁÖ °£
°ÝÀ¸·Î Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸·Áö¼ö¸¦ °Ë»çÇÏ¿´°í °¢ ±ºÀÇ Ä¡Àº¿°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ ÀÚ
Loe¿Í SilnessÀÇ Áö¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 4ÁÖ°£ 1ÁÖ °£°ÝÀ¸·Î Ä¡ÀºÁö¼ö¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á
·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÀÕ¼ÖÁú°ú ÇÔ²² 0.02% NaF ¹× 0.05% CPC ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À¸·Î 4ÁÖ°£ ¾çÄ¡¸¦ ÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­
Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸· Áö¼ö´Â ½ÇÇèÀü 1.04¡¾0.44¿¡¼­ 0.54¡¾0.30·Î À½¼ººñ±³±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ
¿´°í(P<0.01) Loe ¿Í Silness ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ä¡ÀºÁö¼ö´Â ½ÇÇèÀü 0.19¡¾0.10¿¡¼­ 0.14¡¾0.07·Î °¨¼Ò
ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ÀÕ¼ÖÁú°ú ÇÔ²² 0.02% NaF,0.05% CPC ¿Í 0.005% UDCA¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ±¸°­¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À» 4ÁÖ
°£ »ç¿ëÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡¼­ Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸·Áö¼ö´Â ½ÇÇèÀü 1.14¡¾0.49¿¡¼­ 4ÁÖÈÄ 0.42¡¾0.41·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´
´Ù(P<0.01).
Ä¡Àº¿°Áö¼ö´Â ½ÇÇèÀü 0.17¡¾0.09¿¡¼­ 4ÁÖÈÄ 0.12¡¾0.08·Î Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒµÇ¾ú´Ù
(P<0.05).
3. 4ÁÖ°£ÀÇ ½ÇÇè°á°ú Ä¡¸é¼¼±Õ¸·Áö¼ö ¹× Ä¡ÀºÁö¼öÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ À־ ¾ç¼ººñ±³±º°ú 0.02%
NaF, 0.05% CPC ¿Í 0.005% UDCA¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¿ë¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺 »çÀÌ¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀÎ À¯ÀÇ
¼ºÀº ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç, 0.02% NaF ¹× 0.05% CPC ¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×À¸·Î ¾çÄ¡ÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺°ú 0.02% NaF,
0.05% CPC ¿Í 0.005% UDC.L¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ¿ë¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÑ ½ÇÇ豺 »çÀÌ¿¡µµ Åë°èÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀº
¾ø¾ú´Ù.

The purposes of this clinical study were to determine and compare the antiplaque and
antigingivitis effectiveness of an experimental mouthrinse containing sodium
fluoride(NaF), cetylpyridinium chloride(CPC) and ursodeoxycholic acid(UDCA) by
following the American Dental Association(ADA) guidelines for acceptance of
chemotherapeutic products for the control of supragingival dental plaque and gingivitis.
A mouth rinse containing 0.02% NaF and a commercial over-the-counter mouthrinse,
Listerine, which was accepted by the ADA, were used as a negative and positive
control group respectively in this study. The active ingredients of the two experimental
mouthrinses were either the two component of 0.02% NaF and 0.05% CPC or three
component of 0.02% NaF, 0.05% CPC and 0.005% UDCA.
A total of 220 human subjects, between 18 and 30 years of age , were stratified into
four balanced groups of 55 each according to age and baseline patient hygiene
performance (PHP) index and Loe-Silness Gingival Index(GI) scores. Each group was
randomly assigned to the use of one of test mouthrinses. They were instructed to rinse
twice (in the morning and immediately prior to bed time) daily for 60 seconds with 10
to 15m1 of their assigned. Other oral hygiene practice were not allowed for four weeks
of study period. The PHP and GI indices were determined weekly intervals. After 4
weeks' use of test mouthrinses, the indices obtained from 117 subjects who completed
the study were statistically analysed and compared the differences among test rinses.
After four weeks, the use of rinse containing two component of NaF and CPC
provided a significant reduction ol PHP index by 48% (p<0.01) and GI index by 26%
(p<0.01). The use of three component of NaF, CPC and UDCA significantly reduced
PHP index and GI by 63 and 29% respectively (p<0.05). However, no statistical
differences were indicated between the positive control (Listerine) and either the two
component or three component mouthrinses. No statistical differences were also indicated
between two component (NaF and CPC) and three component (NaF, CPC and UDCA)
mouthrinses. However, there were numerically lower indices in three component rinse as
compare to two component rinse after 4 weeks of experimental period.
These results indicate that twice daily use of either the CPC rinse or CPC and UDCA
rinse in the presence of fluoride significantly reduces PHP and GI induces as compared
to negative NaF control rinse.

Å°¿öµå

±¸°­¾çÄ¡¿ë¾×; UDCA; mouthrinse; mouthrinse; UDCA;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed